Help Animals and Modernize Chemical Testing

Landmark Bill Will Reduce Use of Animals in Cruel Chemical Tests.

For 35 years, PETA has worked to help federal agencies understand that poisoning animals doesn’t make humans safer or healthier, and we’re thrilled that lawmakers in Washington, D.C., are beginning to agree.

PETA applauds the bipartisan passage last night by the Senate of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. The legislation—which was drafted in collaboration with various stakeholders—rightfully adopts the approach outlined in the National Academy of Sciences report “Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy,” which presents a strategy for moving away from animal testing.
Two rats
The bill contains important language to reduce and replace the use of animals in painful chemical toxicity tests. Modernizing the way in which chemicals are tested will enable better regulation of dangerous chemicals, thus protecting both humans and animals. It is an important step in the right direction.

The bill requires that alternatives to animal tests be considered and used, and it places restrictions on animal testing that are much stronger than current law. These restrictions, along with the bill’s requirement that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency fund the development of non-animal methods, will speed up the development and implementation of testing methods that don’t use animals.

Our work is not done. We still need to make sure that the final legislation maintains all the important provisions regarding good science and replacing animal use. We look forward to final congressional passage of the bill with its animal protection language intact and to its being signed into law by the president.


Note: PETA supports animal rights and opposes all forms of animal exploitation and educates the public on those issues. PETA does not directly or indirectly participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office or any political party.

Earlier this year Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and David Vitter (R-La.) introduced the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (S. 697), which would revise the decades-old Toxic Substances Control Act.

The bill contains many provisions that will reduce and replace animals in chemical tests, and will bring about the vision of 21st century toxicity testing—using quick and human-relevant in vitro tests—recommended by the National Academy of Sciences to protect public health and prevent animal testing.


The bill requires the Environmental Protection Agency and the chemical industry to consider and use alternatives to animal tests. It also places restrictions on animal testing—which are stronger than current law—that will over time ensure the development and adoption of modern nonanimal methods.

Please call or e-mail your senators today, and tell them to vote FOR the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (S. 697) because it modernizes testing methods and restricts animal testing.

After contacting your senators, please forward this message to your friends.

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (S. 697), which could reduce -- if not eliminate -- the use of animals for chemical testing, is primed for Senate floor action. We need you to contact your Senator TODAY and tell them to support this bill and bring it to the floor for a vote.
This bill would reduce the suffering of millions of rabbits, guinea pigs, mice and other creatures. That's why we need you to contact your Senators right now and tell them to support this important bill!

Please make a brief, polite phone call to Sen. Cory Booker at (202) 224-3224 and Sen. Robert Menendez at (202) 224-4744 now. You can say, "I'm calling to ask you to support S. 697, which will improve the science behind chemical testing on animals."
Each year, tens of thousands of animals are killed to test industrial chemicals, including those ingredients found in common household products. These animals suffer terribly, as harsh chemicals are rubbed into their skin, forced down their throats and dropped in their eyes.
But it doesn't have to be that way. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (S. 697) would improve the science behind chemical testing, encourage better safety decisions to protect the environment and human health and reduce -- if not eliminate -- the use of animals.
Introduced by Sens. Tom Udall, D-N.M. and David Vitter, R-La., it has reached 60 bipartisan cosponsors, meaning it has a good chance of passing if brought up for a vote. That's why it's so important your Senator hears from you. After your call, please take one more moment to send a follow-up message.
I am thrilled to tell you that when congressional negotiators released the omnibus spending package early this morning, we were victorious on a number of key animal protection issues. The omnibus bill provides important funding for animal welfare enforcement and development of alternatives to animal testing, and among other key provisions, it prohibits the use of funds to allow horse slaughter plants to open in the U.S., retains the Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves and allows the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to crack down on the domestic trade in ivory to protect elephants from poaching. These are important congressional outcomes for animal protection, and now we need your help to get even more done on the animal testing issue.

NIH Ending Baby Monkey Experiments. Following an intensive yearlong PETA campaign, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has announced that  it’s ending the cruel psychological experiments on baby monkeys conducted by Stephen Suomi, who led this horrendous project at NIH for more than 30 years. His laboratory is being closed down, and he will no longer be involved in any experiments on animals.

The decision—which was first confirmed by Rep. Brendan Boyle’s office—came as PETA was preparing to release troubling new videos and e-mails obtained from NIH showing that the experiments had continued through this year and that NIH officials had lied about the project’s status to members of Congress, the media, and others.
NIH Maternal Dep 1
PETA’s campaign began last fall when we released disturbing video footage of cruel and archaic maternal-deprivation experiments in which infant monkeys were torn away from their mothers at birth, terrorized with loud sounds and fake snakes, intimidated by human experimenters, addicted to alcohol, and forced to live alone in tiny cages in order to worsen their psychological distress. The trauma inflicted on the infants by NIH psychologically and physically crippled many of the monkeys for life.
NIH Baby Monkey in Cage
PETA’s effort to stop baby monkeys from being terrorized and tortured at NIH included colorful protests, hard-hitting advertising campaigns, a disruption of an NIH seminar, and even a D.C.-wide guerilla street art installation by renowned artist Dan Witz.
actual-victims-NIH-Bethesda-flat-copy
More than a quarter million PETA supporters wrote to and called government officials to plead with them to take action. Celebrities—including actor James Cromwell, TV icon Bob Barker, celebrity psychotherapist Dr. Jenn Berman, conservative strategist Mary Matalin, members of Congress—led by Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard—and various scientists criticized the experiments. Dr. Jane Goodall noted that in addition to being inhumane, the experiments were not applicable to humans and could easily be replaced with superior human-based research tools.
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard
In response to the news, Rep. Roybal-Allard remarked, “For more than a year, I’ve been working to end cruel and wasteful experiments on infant monkeys at the National Institutes of Health. I am proud to have helped get the NIH to stop these experiments, and I am pleased that the laboratory where the experiments are conducted will be closed after more than thirty years. However, there is still more work to do. We must send these monkeys to sanctuaries, and get closer review of all primate tests so that we can identify and end unnecessary experiments.”

PETA filed numerous complaints and scientific critiques with federal agencies and did vigilant follow-ups on the status of the experiments through the Freedom of Information Act.

There are approximately 300 monkeys left at the NIH laboratory and we will be pushing for them to be retired to sanctuaries, as NIH has committed to doing with chimpanzees.

Tell Univ of Oklahoma to provide baboons sanctuary vs transfer to a research lab.
In September 2015 the University of Oklahoma (OU) announced their bold step to close their baboon research and breeding program on the heels of a campaign by SAEN – Stop Animal Exploitation NOW! But now, the future of over 670 baboons is uncertain. Please sign our petition asking the University of Oklahoma to retire their baboons to a sanctuary rather than killing or transferring them to another animal testing facility!

OU is still responsible for the baboons in their research and breeding colony even after the closure of this program. The best outcome is for OU to convert their baboon facility into a sanctuary as recommended by SAEN and primate experts.

Instead, OU has stated that they are “working closely with the National Institutes of Health to develop a comprehensive plan for the placement of the baboons." Your signature is a crucial voice in demanding that these baboons not be transferred to another research facility!

Please join us in signing and sharing this petition to support OU in their bold closure announcement and encourage them to take the precedent-setting step of turning OU’s baboon facility into a sanctuary!

University of Oklahoma, President David L. Boren
First, we want to thank you for your bold decision to close OU’s baboon research and breeding program.

However, we are very concerned about a statement circulating in the media that "OU is working closely with the National Institutes of Health to develop a comprehensive plan for the placement of the baboons." Our concern lies in that your baboons will be transferred to another research facility instead of being retired.

Please work with primate experts in initiating a precedent-setting step of turning OU’s baboon facility into a sanctuary.
Humane Society Legislative Fund