MORNING MESSAGE
With
trade as a major issue in this election season (voters are against it), the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is clearly in trouble. All but one (John Kasich)
of the remaining presidential candidates oppose it, with both Donald Trump and
Bernie Sanders actively campaigning against the damage the country’s trade
policies have done to working people. Could this also mean an end to these kinds
of “free trade” deals generally?
SANDERS MAKES CASE TO STAY IN
Obama
tries to nudge Sanders out. NYT: “President Obama privately told a group of
Democratic donors last Friday that … the party must soon come together to back
her … Mr. Obama chose his words carefully, and did not explicitly call on Mr.
Sanders to quit the race, according to those in the room … [But] they took his
comments as a signal to Mr. Sanders that perpetuating his campaign … could only
help the Republicans…”
Sanders
dismisses. Reuters quotes: “”The bottom line is that when only half of the
American people have participated in the political process … I think it is
absurd for anybody to suggest that those people not have a right to cast a
vote.”
Sanders
campaign sees uphill battle for AZ Tuesday. Politico: “Sanders chief
strategist Tad Devine acknowledged the challenges … ‘There’s a lot of early vote
and she tends to be very much ahead with the early vote. I think about half the
people have already voted in Arizona … But I think we’re closing hard.'”
Bernie
eyes delegate-rich CA and NY. W. Post: “Looking beyond Tuesday, Sanders said
he is heartened that ‘we have the largest states in the country yet to come,’
adding that he is confident he can do well in delegate-rich California and New
York. ‘I’ve got a shot to win California, and I think we can win it big,’
Sanders said, adding that some of the most progressive states in the country are
on the West Coast and have yet to cast ballots.”
Clinton
struggles with white men. NYT: “Her standing among white men does not
threaten her clinching the Democratic nomination this year, or preclude her from
winning in November, unless it craters. Mr. Obama lost the white vote … But what
is striking is the change in attitudes about Mrs. Clinton among those voters,
and her struggle to win them over again.”
ANT-TRUMP CONSERVATIVES STRUGGLE TO STOP HIM
Anti-Trump
conservatives meet. W. Post: “Per three people familiar with the talks, the
mood of the room was muted and downbeat. Attendees voiced frustration with the
lack of coordination so far and wondered aloud whether Trump could be halted.
The third-party scenario drew intense interest, but it was also acknowledged
that it would be logistically and financially difficult…”
Time
talks with Republican delegates about how they’ll vote in a brokered
convention: “Trump supporters like [Stella] Kozanecki say they are loyal to
the end … The GOP’s best hopes of picking off Trump delegates won’t come from
people like Kozanecki, who had to collect 100 signatures to qualify as a
delegate, but from places where party committees wield influence … In Tennessee,
for instance, the state chairman offers a slate of delegates for confirmation by
the state’s executive committee. That means anti-Trump delegates could
theoretically be selected with a commitment to vote for Trump only on the first
ballot.”
Republicans
caused Trump by dismissing the working-class, says NYT’s Krugman: “Kevin
Williamson in National Review [denied] that the white working class … is in any
sense a victim of external forces … but “nobody did this to them. They failed
themselves.’ … Mitt Romney spoke about the 47 percent … Eric Cantor, then the
House majority leader, … chose to mark Labor Day with a Twitter post celebrating
… business owners.”
BATTLE FOR GARLAND HEATS UP
Democrats
press for hearings on Garland. W. Post: “The approach, which is being
implemented in part by a well-organized group led by former aides to President
Obama, involves targeting vulnerable GOP Senate incumbents for defeat by
portraying them as unwilling to fulfill the basic duties of their office. The
idea is to so threaten the Republicans’ Senate majority that party leaders will
reconsider blocking hearings on Garland’s nomination.”
Republican
leaders dismiss lame duck vote on Garland. The Hill: “Senate Majority Leader
Mitch McConnell is … opposed to the idea, according to GOP lawmakers and staff.
‘He said after the next president is sworn in,’ a McConnell spokesman said.”
NYT
explores Garland’s judicial record: “His writings reflect an able and modest
judge with a limited conception of his role … His most charged cases, involving
national security and campaign finance, were as likely to disappoint liberals as
to please them. He has repeatedly voted against detainees at Guantánamo Bay,
Cuba, and he joined the Citizens United decision that gave rise to super PACs.
In more run-of-the-mill cases, he was apt to side with workers claiming
employment discrimination and against criminal defendants who said their rights
had been violated … He appears to apply Supreme Court precedents with
punctilious fidelity even if there is reason to think he would have preferred a
different outcome…”
SYNDER SHIFTS BLAME IN FLINT HEARING
Contentious
Flint hearing, reports The Hill: “Democrats focused most of their fire on
Gov. Rick Snyder (R), blaming him both for allowing an emergency manager to
switch Flint’s water supply as a cost-savings measure and for not acting quickly
enough to respond to the ensuing health problems … [EPA chief Gina] McCarthy
said the EPA did what it was supposed to do with those warnings, including
pushing the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to more
aggressively fix corrosion issues in the city … ‘I will take responsibility for
not pushing hard enough, but I will not take responsibility for causing this
problem,’ she added.”
Snyder
claims he was misled. NYT: “…Gov. Rick Snyder of Michigan acknowledged in a
tense congressional hearing Thursday that he had been aware of complaints about
the drinking water in Flint, including from news reports his aides had emailed
him. Yet he had accepted assurances, he said, that the problems were not
severe.”
Progressive
Breakfast is a daily morning email highlighting news stories of interest to
activists. Progressive Breakfast is a project of the Campaign for America's
Future. more
»